London (CNN Business)When JPMorgan Chase agreed to finance a breakaway competition of some of the world’s richest soccer clubs, it expected some heated discussions.
But America’s biggest bank didn’t foresee this: Following massive blowback from fans, the sport’s governing bodies, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, French President Emmanuel Macron and even the British royal family, efforts to form the European Super League have crumbled in a matter of days.”I don’t think that project is now still up and running,” Andrea Agnelli, chairman of Italian club Juventus and one of the plan’s key architects, said on Wednesday.
Juventus and Man Utd shares plunge as Super League plan collapsesThe 12 teams that tried to form the doomed league have been accused of seeking to orchestrate a massive cash grab by walling themselves off from competition, a goal that runs counter to the traditions of European football.
JPMorgan (JPM), which provided a €3.5 billion ($4.2 billion) loan to get the project started, is now being painted as a willing accomplice to billionaire club owners out to line their own pockets while undermining one of Europe’s prized cultural assets with its roots in working-class communities.Read MoreThe bank has faced criticism and mockery on social media for its role in the deal. One Twitter user sarcastically included a screen shot of Jamie Dimon’s recent letter to shareholders, in which the CEO states that “businesses must earn the trust of their customers and communities by acting ethically and morally.” Others joked about the demise of the “JPMorgan Cup” and slammed America’s efforts to “invade” the European sport.
Been a @jpmorgan @Chase customer since fourth grade when I started saving for a car. #SuperLeague play is making want to leave. Any banks with good promos right now for new customers?
— Austin Price (@Austin_Price_2) April 21, 2021 How did JPMorgan get it so wrong?The bank declined to comment. But a source familiar with the discussions said JPMorgan’s involvement was vetted by an internal committee that assesses potential deals for reputation or credit risks. The lender predicted there could be controversy, but in the end, it would be a matter “for the football world to decide.””There’s always a large emotional component to [sports],” the source said. “When you’re making a financial decision on a loan, you have to try to put emotion aside.”The source said discussions about forming a league had been underway for a number of years, though JPMorgan was not involved in any negotiations between clubs.The bank had existing relationships with many of the teams involved. It provided stadium financing for Real Madrid, whose president Florentino Perez was also set to lead the Super League.The debt-financing agreement was a long-term bet, with funding set to be paid off over 23 years and secured against the competition’s future broadcasting rights, which were expected to be extremely lucrative.But JPMorgan clearly underestimated the magnitude of the backlash, which the source admitted had been “extraordinary.”The bank will not suffer a financial loss if the project doesn’t go ahead. But among some fans of the sport, its image has taken a major hit.”The reputational risk in being the principal financier … is massive,” commentator Ben Marlow wrote in a column published this week in UK newspaper The Telegraph. “Bank-bashers will see it as a gift.”
The Guardian observed that it’s a good thing JPMorgan has not yet launched its new digital UK bank.”If it had, calls for a boycott would probably be heard already,” wrote financial editor Nils Pratley.
Source: edition.cnn.com
